U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Juan Sanabria-Perez

United States v. Juan Sanabria-Perez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2010

United States v. Juan Sanabria-Perez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 01 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10520 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01273-FJM v. MEMORANDUM * JUAN SANABRIA-PEREZ, AKA Maximino Hernandez-Vega, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 16, 2010 ** Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Juan Sanabria-Perez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 65-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sanabria-Perez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SR/Research 2 08-10520

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.