U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Jumah Moore-Ali v. Jeanne Woodford

Jumah Moore-Ali v. Jeanne Woodford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 5, 2010 · Schroeder, Pregerson, Leavy
373 F. App'x 706

Jumah Moore-Ali v. Jeanne Woodford

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jumah Thomas Moore-Ali appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his application to pursue his civil rights action in forma pau-peris (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.

Moore-Ali does not contest on appeal that he is a three-strikes filer under 28 *707 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Moreover, the district court correctly determined that he did not show that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The harm Moore-Ali alleged occurred approximately one year before he filed the action. Accordingly, the district court properly denied his IFP application.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.