U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Eun Ju Jegal-Kim v. Holder

Eun Ju Jegal-Kim v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 19, 2010 · Rymer, McKeown, Paez
376 F. App'x 743

Counsel

Alex C. Park, Esquire, Santa Clara, CA, for Petitioner., Edward Earl Wiggers, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Eun Ju Jegal-Kim v. Holder

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eun Ju Jegal-Kim, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

The agency properly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Jegal-Kim’s application for a U Visa. See Ramirez Sanchez v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1254, 1255-56 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has sole jurisdiction over the issuance of U Visa petitions); see also Lee v. Holder, 599 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).

Jegal-Kim’s remaining contention is not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.