MEMORANDUM **

Tremaine Moore appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Moore contends that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his supervised release. The record reflects that the district court’s determination that Moore violated his supervised release by possessing a firearm is supported by a *620 preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see also United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.