United States v. Ricardo Cruzagosto

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit October 12, 2010

United States v. Ricardo Cruzagosto, 399 F. App'x 251 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Cruzagosto appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cruzagosto contends that the district court erred when it failed to lower his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) following the United States Sentencing Commission’s adoption of Amendment 706. We affirm in light of Dillon v. United States, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo CRUZAGOSTO, Defendant-Appellant
Status: Unpublished