United States v. Armando Marino-Nava

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Armando Marino-Nava

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10516

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00582-FJM v.

MEMORANDUM * ARMANDO MARINO-NAVA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Armando Marino-Nava appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 86- month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Marino-Nava’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10516

Reference

Status
Unpublished