United States v. Dwayne Falconer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Dwayne Falconer

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-55165

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00749-SVW v.

MEMORANDUM * DWAYNE ALLEN FALCONER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Dwayne Allen Falconer appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduced sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Falconer contends that he is entitled to a reduced sentence in light of the crack-cocaine amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Falconer’s contention fails because he was previously sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and was thus not sentenced “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730-32 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 09-55165

Reference

Status
Unpublished