United States v. Dwayne Falconer
United States v. Dwayne Falconer
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-55165 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00749-SVW v. MEMORANDUM * DWAYNE ALLEN FALCONER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Dwayne Allen Falconer appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduced sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Falconer contends that he is entitled to a reduced sentence in light of the crack-cocaine amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Falconer’s contention fails because he was previously sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and was thus not sentenced “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730-32 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
2 09-55165
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.