U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Ricky Burningham v. Cir

Ricky Burningham v. Cir
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 27, 2010
Ricky Burningham v. Cir

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICKY BURNINGHAM, No. 09-70620 Petitioner - Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 7948-07 v. MEMORANDUM * COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court Submitted December 14, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Ricky Burningham appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing his petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Abrams v. Comm’r, 814 F.2d 1356, 1357 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The tax court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because Burningham was never issued a Notice of Deficiency or a Notice of Determination.

See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6213(a), 6330(d); Abrams, 814 F.2d at 1357 (holding that a pre- filing notification letter from the Internal Revenue Service was not a Notice of Deficiency, and therefore, the tax court had no jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s petition).

Burningham’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

2 09-70620

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.