U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Kaufmann v. GEICO General Insurance

Kaufmann v. GEICO General Insurance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2010 · Ezra, Smith, Thomas
400 F. App'x 258

Counsel

Thomas J. Beers, Beers Law Offices, Missoula, MT, Matthew Clifford, Oakland, CA, James A. Manley, Manley Law Firm, Poison, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellant., John E. Bohyer, Stefan W. Farr, Paul N. Tranel, Bohyer Simpson & Tranel, P.C., Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellee.

Kaufmann v. GEICO General Insurance

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

After carefully considering the briefs, record, and arguments of counsel, the Court affirms the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in Magistrate *259Judge Lynch’s well-reasoned opinion of February 1, 2010.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.