U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Muhammad

United States v. Muhammad
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2010 · Fernandez, Gould, Smith
369 F. App'x 855

United States v. Muhammad

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Godlife Asad Muhammad appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Muhammad’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No *856pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 846, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.