U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Quiroa-Arias

United States v. Quiroa-Arias
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2010 · McKeown, Paez, Rymer
375 F. App'x 794

United States v. Quiroa-Arias

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Victor Quiroa-Arias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Quiroa-Arias’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Qui-roa-Arias the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.