U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Roberts

United States v. Roberts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2010 · McKeown, Paez, Rymer
377 F. App'x 600

United States v. Roberts

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jimmy Lowell Roberts appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 100-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *601L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roberts’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.