U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Webb v. Onizuka

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2010 · Canby, Fletcher, Thomas

384 F. App'x 608

Counsel

David Webb, Clearfield, UT, pro se., Emmanuel G. Guerrero, Esquire, John Ryan Dwyer, Jr., Esquire, Principal Litigation Counsel, Dwyer Schraff Meyer Grant & Green, Pamela W. Bunn, Jason C. Zhao, Paul, Johnson, Park & Niles, Yuriko Jane Sugimura, Esquire, Bendet Fidell Sakai & Lee, Sarah S.P. Wong, Kobayashi, Sugita & Goda, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Igarashi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

David Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action arising from his purchase of a used vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 *609U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Peralta v. Hispanic Bus., Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1068 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm the dismissal of each defendant because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.