U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Barrientos-Velez

United States v. Barrientos-Velez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2010 · Alarcón, Graber, Leavy
388 F. App'x 730

United States v. Barrientos-Velez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Sebastian Barrientos-Velez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), *731Barrientos-Velez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.