U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Hellman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2010 · Kozinski, Reinhardt, Whyte

391 F. App'x 614

Counsel

Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Nancy Spiegel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., David E. Durchfort, Kosnett & Durch-fort, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rhonda O'Neal v. Michael Astrue (9th Cir. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM***

The government failed to object below and hasn’t shown a “reasonable probability that [Heilman] would have received a different sentence but for the district court’s error.” United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 741 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.