Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 12, 2010 · Kozinski
638 F.3d 1111; 2010 WL 5174984 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Opinion

598 F.3d 1061 (2010)

Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-56306.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 12, 2010.

Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King & Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams & Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑