Curin-Franco v. Holder
Curin-Franco v. Holder
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Sergio Orlando Curin-Franco, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2007), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Curin-Franco’s motion to reopen as untimely because he filed it more than one year after the BIA’s final removal order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Curin-Franco failed to demonstrate changed country conditions to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also He, 501 F.3d at 1132 (changed personal circumstances insufficient to support an untimely motion to reopen).
Curin-Franco’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.