United States v. Ramon Medina-Cota
United States v. Ramon Medina-Cota
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10333 & 08-10334 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:01-cr-01796-RCC 4:06-cr-01718-RCC v. MEMORANDUM * RAMON LORENZO MEDINA-COTA, a.k.a. Ramon Medina-Cota, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 10, 2011 ** Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Ramon Lorenzo Medina-Cota appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 75-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from his revocation of supervised * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Medina-Cota’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a supplemental brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.
2 08-10333 & 08-10334
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.