U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Felipe Zamora-Villela

United States v. Felipe Zamora-Villela
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 21, 2011 · Beezer, Tallman, Callahan
411 F. App'x 114

United States v. Felipe Zamora-Villela

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Felipe Zamora-Villela appeals from the 36-month mandatory minimum sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for bringing in illegal aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), bringing in illegal aliens without presentation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii), and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Zamora-Villela contends that because 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) permits a district court to impose a sentence below a mandatory minimum, the district court erred by imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence. Zamora-Villela’s contention is foreclosed by United States v. Wipf, 620 F.3d 1168, 1170-71 (9th Cir. 2010) (Subsection (a) of section 3553 does not authorize a court to impose a sentence below the mandatory statutory minimum).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.