U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Mukesh Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Mukesh Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2011

Mukesh Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 02 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS MUKESH SINGH, A# 73-218-766, No. 10-35480 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00397-JLR v. MEMORANDUM* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; et al., Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 10, 2011 Seattle, Washington Before: B. FLETCHER, PAEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Mukesh Singh (“Singh”) appeals from the district court’s order denying his habeas petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Simultaneously, with the filing of this order, we filed an order in the related case of Singh v. Holder, No. 03-72088, granting Singh’s 2009 Motion to Reinstate Petition for Review. With the reinstatement of the Petition for Review, Singh has achieved all the relief that he seeks in the instant appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.