U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Enrique Valdez Mora v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Enrique Valdez Mora v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2011 · Canby, Fernandez, Smith
417 F. App'x 681

Enrique Valdez Mora v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique Fernando Valdez Mora and Anastacia Antonia Valdez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.

To the extent we have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of petitioners’ motion to remand, see Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601 (9th Cir. 2006), we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant remand, see Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.