U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Alvaro Ramirez-Baldenebro

United States v. Alvaro Ramirez-Baldenebro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 8, 2011 · Canby, Fernandez, Smith
419 F. App'x 752

United States v. Alvaro Ramirez-Baldenebro

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

. Alvaro Ramirez-Baldenebro appeals from his conviction and 160-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)© and 846; and possession with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. *753 § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)®. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez-B aldenebro’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.