U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Magdalena Ramirez

United States v. Magdalena Ramirez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 14, 2011
421 F. App'x 701
United States v. Magdalena Ramirez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 14 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50351 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00444-MMM v. MEMORANDUM * MAGDALENA SANTANA RAMIREZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Magdalena Santana Ramirez appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 70- month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 08-50351

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.