United States v. Magdalena Ramirez
United States v. Magdalena Ramirez
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 14 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50351 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00444-MMM v. MEMORANDUM * MAGDALENA SANTANA RAMIREZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Magdalena Santana Ramirez appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 70- month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 08-50351
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.