U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Charles Morris v. Michael Budge

Charles Morris v. Michael Budge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2011

Charles Morris v. Michael Budge

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES DEJUAN MORRIS, No. 10-15688 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00493-ECR- RAM v. MICHAEL BUDGE; ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM * GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 14, 2011 ** San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dejuan Morris, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.