U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Ricardo Cordero-Ontiveros

United States v. Ricardo Cordero-Ontiveros
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2011

United States v. Ricardo Cordero-Ontiveros

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50622 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03510-LAB-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego RICARDO CORDERO-ONTIVEROS, ORDER Defendant - Appellant.

Before: PREGERSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and HOLLAND, Senior District Judge.* The memorandum disposition filed December 21, 2010, is hereby amended as follows: At page 3, lines 4-5, replace “It was logical and reasonable for the district court to use Cordero’s past sentences as a starting point for setting his new sentence” with “It was logical and reasonable for the district court to set Cordero’s sentence higher than his past sentences”.

With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained.

* The Honorable H. Russel Holland, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Alaska, Anchorage, sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.