U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Antonio Castro

United States v. Antonio Castro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2011

United States v. Antonio Castro

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50147 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01238-RGK v. MEMORANDUM * ANTONIO MONTES CASTRO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Montes Castro appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51- month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Castro’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 10-50147

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.