U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Gary Hallford v. Hillary Clinton

Gary Hallford v. Hillary Clinton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2011

Gary Hallford v. Hillary Clinton

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 17 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY WILLIAM HALLFORD, No. 10-17547 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:10-cv-04488-WHA v. MEMORANDUM * HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gary Williams Hallford appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of his action seeking a Writ of Prohibition against the Secretary of State to prevent her from enforcing an age requirement in hiring employees for the United Nations. We have jurisdiction * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's decision to dismiss Wilson's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order dismissing the case, filed on November 1, 2010.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.