U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Limon-Robles v. Holder

Limon-Robles v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 28, 2011 · Farris, O'Scannlain, Bybee
424 F. App'x 689

Counsel

John Martin Pope, Pope & Associates, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner., Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Erica Miles, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Limon-Robles v. Holder

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 28 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MARTIN LIMON-ROBLES, No. 06-71175 Petitioner, Agency No. A035-825-304 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Martin Limon-Robles, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The agency determined that Limon-Robles was removable under the aggravated felony ground of deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), based on his 1987 conviction for violating Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-1405, 1401, 3821, 1001, 604.01, 702, 801 and 812. Subsequent to the agency’s decision in this case, we held in Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder, Nos. 03-73648, 04-35048, 2010 WL 5174979 (9th Cir. Dec. 22, 2010), that 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) does not apply to convictions that occurred prior to November 18, 1988. We therefore grant the petition for review and remand to the agency in light of Ledezma-Galicia.

In light of our disposition, we need not address Limon-Robles’ remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

BYBEE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgement: I reluctantly concur in the judgment. I continue to believe that Ledezma- Galicia was wrongly decided. See Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder, ____ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. Dec. 22, 2010) (Bybee, J., dissenting).

2 06-71175

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.