Francisco Barraza-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Francisco Barraza-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Francisco Javier Barraza-Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. *679 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Barraza-Gomez is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(A), and that he gave false testimony for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit, precluding him from demonstrating good moral character under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6). See Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th Cir. 2001).
Petitioner’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.