MEMORANDUM **

Thomas Graham appeals from the 100-month sentence imposed following his conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 851(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Graham contends that the district court proeedurally erred by applying the career offender enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.1 (a)(3) based on previous convictions resulting from nolo contendere pleas in the California state court. California courts treat a plea of nolo contendere as the equivalent of a guilty plea conviction. See United States v. Anderson, 625 F.3d 1219, 1220 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam). Because Graham was convicted of qualifying previous felonies, the district court’s application of the career offender enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 47 F.3d 993, 995 (9th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.