MEMORANDUM **

Francisco C. Cayetano, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence findings of fact, including adverse credibility determinations, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir. 2001), and deny the petition for review.

*561 Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Cayetano admitted his original asylum application was not truthful regarding the incident that allegedly prompted his persecutors to abduct and threaten him. See Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 2005) (lying on an asylum application is an “indication of dishonesty”); Don v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 738, 741-42 (9th Cir. 2007) (discrepancies “regarding the event that allegedly spurred [the persecutors] to threaten [petitioner] goes to the heart of his persecution claim and is not trivial”). In the absence of credible testimony, Cayetano’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.