U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Braulio Rivera-Andraca

United States v. Braulio Rivera-Andraca
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2011 · Rymer, Thomas, Paez
430 F. App'x 585

United States v. Braulio Rivera-Andraca

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Braulio Rivera-Andraca appeals form the 22-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rivera-Andraca’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.