John Crim v. Neil Adler
John Crim v. Neil Adler
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner John Michael Crim appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 1 and we affirm.
*581 Crim contends that the district court erred by denying his habeas petition seeking immediate consideration for transfer into a Residential Reentry Center (RRC). The record reflects that the district court did not err in denying the petition because, at the time of its decision, Crim had already received an individualized consideration for RRC placement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b) and 3624(c), and Rodriguez v. Smith, 541 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2008).
Crim’s remaining contentions, to the extent they are understandable, are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.