Kenya Gayles v. D. Sisto
Kenya Gayles v. D. Sisto
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
California state parolee Kenya Gayles appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ha *563 beas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and dismiss the appeal as moot.
Contending that an allegedly improper 2006 disciplinary action made it more likely that he would be denied parole, Gayles sought expungement of the disciplinary action against him. While his appeal was pending, Gales was released from state custody. Since Gales has been released on parole, his petition is moot. See Munoz v. Rowland, 104 F.3d 1096, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 1997). All pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.