Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Havelock

United States v. Havelock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 9, 2011 · Kozinski
619 F.3d 1091 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Havelock

Opinion

645 F.3d 1083 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kurt William HAVELOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10472.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 9, 2011.

Michael Thomas Morrissey, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this *1084 case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑