U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Integrated Knowl. v. Integrated Knowl.

Integrated Knowl. v. Integrated Knowl.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 16, 2011

Integrated Knowl. v. Integrated Knowl.

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAY 16 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS In re: INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE No. 07-56818 MARKETING, INC., BAP No. CC-07-01115-PaBaK Debtor, MEMORANDUM * EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP and JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL, LLP, Appellants, v. INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE MARKETING, INC., d/b/a IKM; et al., Appellees.

In re: INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE No. 07-56849 MARKETING, INC., BAP No. CC-07-01092-PaBaK Debtor,

EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP and JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

LLP, Appellants, v. INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE MARKETING, INC., d/b/a IKM; et al., Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Pappas, Klein, and Bardwil, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted May 10, 2011 ** San Francisco, California Before: GOODWIN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and O’GRADY, District Judge.***

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C § 327, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner L.L.P. and Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel L.L.P. were hired as joint special counsel to prosecute claims on behalf of the Chapter 7 Trustee. They now appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s decision affirming: (1) the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of the case; and (2) the bankruptcy court’s separate order on administrative fees and costs. Substantially for the reasons ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See F ED. R. A PP. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Liam O’Grady, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s unpublished memorandum in this matter, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4845 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Nov. 6, 2007), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.