MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Dyretha (Dicy) Hambright (“Hambright”) appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we need not recount it here.

The district court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the USPS on Hambright’s claims of retaliation and race discrimination under Title VII. Even if we assume, arguendo, that Hambright made a prima facie case of retaliation, she has not offered “specific” and “substantial” circumstantial evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the Postal Service’s legitimate reason for its actions is a pretext for a retaliatory motive. See Nilsson v. City of Mesa, 508 F.3d 947, 954-55 (9th Cir. 2007). Hambright failed to make a prima facie case of race discrimination because her proposed comparators are not “similarly situated” employees. See Moran v. Selig, 447 F.3d 748, 755 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.