U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Luis Palomares-Guzman

United States v. Luis Palomares-Guzman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 26, 2011
434 F. App'x 683

United States v. Luis Palomares-Guzman

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 26 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10205 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01163-DGC v. MEMORANDUM * LUIS ALBERTO PALOMARES- GUZMAN, a.k.a. Jorge Santana, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Luis Alberto Palomares-Guzman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 53-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Palomares-Guzman’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10205

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.