United States v. Carmen Integlia

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 27 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10087 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:07-CR-00088-LRH v. MEMORANDUM * CARMEN DE OLIVEIRA INTEGLIA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Carmen de Oliveira Integlia appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 18- month sentence for mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Oliveira Integlia’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10087