U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Cooke v. Solis

Cooke v. Solis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2011 · Reinhardt, Wardlaw, Smith
645 F.3d 1096; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10914; 2011 WL 2129846 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Amy F. Morton, Esquire, Morton & Russo, Vallejo, CA, Michael Satris, Esquire, Law Office of Michael Satris, Bolinas, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Jessica Nicole Blonien, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Elizabeth S. Kim, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, Oakland, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Cooke v. Solis

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to file the supplemental brief lodged with the Clerk’s office is GRANTED. In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Swarthout v. Cooke, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732, dated January 24, 2011, the district court’s order denying the writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.