U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Leo Edwards

United States v. Leo Edwards
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 7, 2011
United States v. Leo Edwards

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 07 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 10-10205 10-10206 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-08113-JAT v. 3:05-cr-00175-JAT LEO LEON EDWARDS, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Leo Leon Edwards appeals from the lifetime term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a convicted sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Edwards contends that the district court abused its discretion and failed to explain adequately the imposition of a lifetime term supervised release. The valid and enforceable appeal waiver precludes our review of these contentions. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

DISMISSED.

2 10-10205

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.