MEMORANDUM **

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals from the nine-month sentence imposed following revocation of juvenile delinquent supervision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Appellant contends that the district court’s sentence contravenes the rehabilitative purposes of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5031 et seq. (FJDA), because it reflects impermissible factors and was not the least restrictive means of achieving these purposes. The record reflects that the district court adequately considered the relevant factors within the FJDA while accounting for the totality of Appellant’s unique circumstances and rehabilitative needs, and imposed a sentence that was the least restrictive means to meet those needs. See United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.