U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Julio Alvarado v. William Bratton

Julio Alvarado v. William Bratton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 9, 2011

Julio Alvarado v. William Bratton

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 09 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO ALVARADO, individually, No. 09-56979 Plaintiff - Appellant, D. Ct. No. 2:06-cv-07812-PA-RC v. WILLIAM BRATTON, individually and ORDER * in his official capacity; LEE BACA, individually and in his official capacity; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; LARRY W. WALDIE, individually and in his official capacity; DOYLE R. CAMPBELL, Assistant Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity; PAUL K. TANAKA, Assistant Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity; MARC L. KLUGMAN, Division Chief, individually and in his official capacity; ERIK SCHICK, #33748, in his individual capacity; MICHAEL LAMBARTH, #337245, in his individual capacity; DAVID GRIMES, #31168, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. and WILLIAM STONICH, Assistant Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity; CHARLES JACKSON, Division Chief, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 7, 2011 ** Pasadena, California Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

We affirm the district court’s comprehensive judgment dated November 17, 2009, for the reason given by the court in its thorough in chambers minute order dated November 16, 2009.

AFFIRMED.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.