In re Monroy
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re: Julie Thuy Vu (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2012)
- In re: Marilyn Theresa Paventy (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2022)
- Kelly v. Clear Recon Corp (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 2021)
- In re: Nanette Sisk (9th Cir. 2020)
- ANTONIO F POLVOROSA (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada 2020)
- In re: Augustine Pena, III (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2019)
- O&S Trucking, Inc. v. Mercedes Benz Financial Serv. (8th Cir. 2016)
- In re Washington (United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2016)
- In re Sperry (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts 2016)
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. Luedtke (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2014)
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. Luedtke (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2014)
- In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. Luedtke (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2014)
- Jaime Medrano v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb (9th Cir. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In re Arthur Daniel MONROY; Laura Monroy, Debtors,
Home Funds Direct, its assignees and/or successors in interest, Appellant,
v.
Arthur Daniel Monroy; Laura Monroy, Appellees.
In re Christine Paulette Hannon, Debtor,
U.S. Bank, N.A., Appellant,
v.
Christine Paulette Hannon; Elizabeth Rojas, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellees.
In re Anthony John Herrera, Jr.; Mary Ellen Herrera, Debtors,
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Anthony John Herrera, Jr.; Mary Ellen Herrera; Elizabeth F. Rojas, Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Lee S. Raphael, Prober & Raphael, Woodland Hills, CA, for the appellants.
M. Erik Clark, Borowitz & Clark, LLP, West Covina, CA, for the appellees.
Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT and PAMELA ANN RYMER, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge.[*]
*1301 ORDER
The decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts are affirmed for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in In re Herrera, 422 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2010), filed January 5, 2010 and attached as an appendix to this order. [Editor's Note: Appendix Omitted for Purposes of Publication][1]
NOTES
[*] The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.
[1] The remand issue raised by the appellants before this court is waived because it was not raised below. In re Cybernetic Servs., Inc., 252 F.3d 1039, 1045 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2001).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.