Tony Vianto v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
Tony Vianto v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Yanting Liu and Yaner Liu, natives and citizens of China, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies in Yanting’s testimony regarding her husband’s visits and the timing of her alleged pregnancy. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir. 2004). Petitioners’ explanation that Yanting was confused does not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah, 348 F.3d at 1156.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.