U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Kenneth Mah

United States v. Kenneth Mah
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2011
United States v. Kenneth Mah

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 23 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50568 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-01564-BEN v. MEMORANDUM * KENNETH POON MAH, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Poon Mah appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for manufacturing marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Mah contends that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, because it applied a clearly improbable burden of proof. We agree. See United States v. Ferryman, 444 F.3d 1183, 1186 (9th Cir. 2006) (the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies for safety valve relief).

The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether Mah can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he qualifies for safety-valve relief.

See United States v. Nelson, 222 F.3d 545, 550-51 (9th Cir. 2000).

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 10-50568

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.