U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Santos Reyes-Gutierrez

United States v. Santos Reyes-Gutierrez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 7, 2011

United States v. Santos Reyes-Gutierrez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 7 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10430 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-CR-00355-JMR v. MEMORANDUM * SANTOS MAXIMILIANO REYES- GUTIERREZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John M. Roll, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted June 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Santos Maximiliano Reyes-Gutierrez appeals from the 56-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), Reyes-Gutierrez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 08-10430

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.