Lonnie Dawson v. Norwood
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lance Williams v. R. Farley (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner Lonnie Dawson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.
Dawson challenges the prison disciplinary decision finding him guilty of using a telephone to further criminal activity and resulting in a 60-day loss of good time credits. Specifically, Dawson contends that his due process rights were violated *287 during the disciplinary hearing because the incident report improperly charged him with violating Code 197 instead of Code 197A and because the discipline hearing officer’s decision is not supported by some evidence. The record reflects that Dawson received all process that was due and that some evidence supports the disciplinary findings. See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-67, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); see also Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.