U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Raul Ramirez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2011 · Schroeder, Alarcón, Leavy

444 F. App'x 114

Counsel

Daniel Gerard Bogden, Esquire, U.S., Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Daniel D. Hollingsworth, Esquire, Kishan Nair, Esquire, USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant., Raul Ramirez, Washington, MS, pro se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Browning 1919A6 .30 Caliber Rifle, SN:958501 (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raul Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion to return $4,527 seized from him on May 4, 1999. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez contends that the district court erred in dismissing his Rule 41(g) motion as barred by the statute of limitations. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Ramirez’s motion was filed on May 8, 2008, and the motion was therefore untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.